It is very obvious to me the Good Reverend and I understand the Bible and the Constitution of the United States differently.
Such an effort aims eventually to get strict constructionists appointed as federal judges and justices, countering what Wildmon and his allies see as decades of “judicial activism” reshaping the nation’s laws and character.
“No legislature has ever passed a law saying obscenity for abortion is legal or that it’s against the law to pray in school,” Wildmon says. “But we’ve got all these judges saying it.”
The First Amendment to the Constitution says, “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….”
Of course his statement is true because they cannot make a law The good Reverend and I should agree to disagree. I say he not compel my children to participate in his prayers in Public Schools. Then I will be okay with him determining the morality on pornography, homosexuality, abortion rights and other political activism and he can call it religion. Alright.John 8 (King James Version)
3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.
I think most all can understand this without the help of a political activist
Author: harold